MO9: Absorbers not so good and absorbers to have a closer look
 ===============================================================

  s369_04_m09c07: thicknesses at obtuse a bit larger than normal. Also
                  QCS reports on one obtuse half-wave unglued. Check it 
                  carefully.

  M09C08: C water went into the vacuum system of Fibertecnic (!!) while
          our regular autoclave cycle. As a result water went inside
          at least some of the moulds of the cycle. As a result, 1
          OW absorber had to be discarded, and the quality of 1 IW is
          marginal. There are another two absorbers wich water went
          clearly inside their moulds but there is no sign of lack of
          quality in the pieces.
  
  b935_02_m10c08: vacuum broken, but QCS reports no apparent problem, except 
                  some lack of brightness on the steal surface. 

  b930_04_m10c08: vacuum broken, but QCS reports no apparent problem. 

  b936_08_m10c08: QCS reports on marks from water on steal surface, but 
                  all measurements OK

  s376_02_m10c08: vacuum broken, but QCS reports no apparent problem.

  sun174_03_m10c08: from thicknesses on QCS it seems that the the moulds 
                    didnt sit well on each other ... I probably wouldnt 
                    use it unless extremely necessary

  s374_04_m10c08: width at acute side larger than at obtuse ... misstype 
                  or real effect ? rest of measurements all right. Check 
                  it carefully before using. 

  s381_02_m10c09: width at acute side larger than at obtuse ... misstype 
                  or real effect ? rest of measurements all right. Check 
                  it carefully before using.